![microsoft remote desktop connection client for mac 2.2 microsoft remote desktop connection client for mac 2.2](http://www.marcel-lancelle.de/research/pr_tpdos/3D_9.png)
- MICROSOFT REMOTE DESKTOP CONNECTION CLIENT FOR MAC 2.2 SOFTWARE
- MICROSOFT REMOTE DESKTOP CONNECTION CLIENT FOR MAC 2.2 PC
- MICROSOFT REMOTE DESKTOP CONNECTION CLIENT FOR MAC 2.2 WINDOWS
and since there wasn't much of a benefit for most uses (recompiling Lazarus is almost instant after the first compile and even that takes less than a minute even on old hardware), it wasn't something that FPC developers focused on much. This made introducing dynamic packages very hard.
![microsoft remote desktop connection client for mac 2.2 microsoft remote desktop connection client for mac 2.2](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/c5HzPA_qSaM/maxresdefault.jpg)
FPC and Lazarus are also technically separate projects with their own release schedules and Lazarus has to work with multiple versions of FPC that make things a bit harder.
MICROSOFT REMOTE DESKTOP CONNECTION CLIENT FOR MAC 2.2 WINDOWS
This was again due to technical limitations from the compiler having to work in multiple OSes (i'm not 100% sure on the detail) and how they share and export symbols from dynamic libraries, something that Delphi didn't have to since it only had to work with Windows and only with their own libraries. It was done because of technical limitations - the compiler didn't support dynamic packages (collections of dynamic libraries). So, while the Freepascal forums seem helpful, it's a meager resource if that's basically all the community is. I found a recent Freepascal university course, but source files with 10kLoC do not make it helpful to get started. On top of that, string handling is imho very uncomfortable in Pascal, feels like nothing changed much in 20 years. Freepascal (and Delphi) come with very complete stdlibs (if they are called that), but I'd not be satisfied with merely Python's stdlib either. I've done some Pascal coding, and this lack of libraries or projects is for me a practical impediment. Very few complete and modern(-ish) repo's, rather than someone throwing their 15 year old Delphi project online. That which I did find is nearly always Delphi (which does not translate to Freepascal, the only platform that would be interesting now I'd say). Like another poster shows, certianly comparatively, you won't find much. I think on here you can safely assume I have tried to Google, and do a codesearch on Github.
![microsoft remote desktop connection client for mac 2.2 microsoft remote desktop connection client for mac 2.2](https://imag.malavida.com/mvimgbig/download-fs/free-pascal-2173-5.jpg)
Hence my advice to ask Google.įinally delphi projects tend to be rather large and high quality, check this one for example: or other repos from the same guy. Suddenly your choice becomes not that big when you separate all the noise.Īlso whole bunch of delphi projects are located elsewhere due to various reasons. However when I am doing C++ I am looking for very few projects in very specific areas (network, file management, db connectivity etc). On top of that both delphi and lazarus come with huge system libraries.Ĭ++ for example dwarfs delphi on github. However 9,000 is still a big number and one can find virtually anything needed from a practical standpoint. There is way less projects on github (the original question specifically mentioned github). You are confusing "hard to find" with "less". There are way more obscure languages some pretty big companies are using for their internal stuff without much ado about popularity. I do not think there is a need for them to prosper in a sense of high Tiobe index. IMHO, nothing has quite captured that experience of development until IntelliJ, starting with 4.x or 5.x.įreePascal/Delphi are used by large number of developers. But once I finally used it, I was instantly converted. As I recall, it took some liberties with the language. I remember that I had some initial skepticism about it. Turbo Pascal was a truly magical piece of software. I had a C compiler from Microsoft that was far more expensive and far slower. Turbo Pascal also blew away anything else available on the PC. Only now, I had 64k instead of my shared of 12k shared among a maximum of four users, an IDE instead of a line editor, and a far better language. Viewed another way, Turbo Pascal recaptured the incredibly rapid edit/run cycle that I first experienced with a PDP-8M running BASIC. Not too bad, but nothing as immediate and responsive as Turbo Pascal. At work, we had a VMS system, and I had access to a C compiler and my first emacs. I don't remember what editor I used, but it certainly wasn't an IDE.
MICROSOFT REMOTE DESKTOP CONNECTION CLIENT FOR MAC 2.2 SOFTWARE
Prior to that, I had developed software in grad school on punch cards. It was like nothing else I had experienced previously.
MICROSOFT REMOTE DESKTOP CONNECTION CLIENT FOR MAC 2.2 PC
In 1986, I ran it on my 64k IBM PC (8088 4MHz). Turbo Pascal was an IDE and a blazingly fast compiler.